I was reading today's today article on yellow ribbon campaign by some journalists. The yellow ribbon campaign is to increase awareness of the social stigma that comes with imprisonment. This social stigma was termed by the campaign as the second prison. Although i fully support the yellow ribbon campaign, i didn't/hadn't got the chance to make a donation. A tiny question would be how would the money help the ex-inmates? Isn't the campaign targetting the employers, to ask them to give these people a second chance?
If i do meet up with people asking for donations for the yellow ribbon campaign, i would donate. In my view, it is a meaningful campaign. But other than that tiny donation, of which i have no idea how it is being used, i cannot help these people as i am not an employer.
Flip a couple pages and the horror of living in sg came alive, vividly. We're ranked number two in the sexually active scale. That is, number two at the bottom. The average number of nookie per year is 79!!! That's only once a week with twice a week sometimes!!! How can this be true!!!! Noooooooooooo!!!!!
To my friends who are married: "Hello?".
To my friends who are getting marreid: "It's really down to you guys to raise the national average."
To my friends who are not married: "..." Um... that's really off topic.
So to boost our national averaeg nookie per year, i am recommending the following time table. One morning quickie and one nite nookie everyday and for weekends, you get an afternoon teabreak. If half the people follow this time table, and the other half follow half of this time table, we'll be hitting the top charts in no time.
Ok, so our average foreplay is four minutes lesser than the 17.9 mins. The morning quickie timetable would only hurt this average. So what!! Wake up earlier to do the full nookie then. Ain't our government promoting us to have babies? We should do something about these things. Or rather, people in the position to do something about these things should do something about these things. Bump our national average up a couple of slots. Number two from the bottom in the world does sound very bad.
All statistical information is provided by 2004 Durex Global Sex Survey.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Haa...the survey gives an accurate protray of S'poreans or not.. not everyone is surveyed and some respondents may not give an accurate answer since responses are via online. Neh.. I dun think it's an accurate finding ;p [Yvonne]
ReplyDeleteHmmm... i differ. That's how statistics work. You don't need to survey the whole population to find an average. Just need a sufficiently sized and sufficiently randomized sample. At 3000+ respondents, i'll say it's pretty significant. However, whether the respondents are randomly chosen enough is a key suspect. If the survey was voluntary or targetted at certain class (wealth, education, location, or even internet access) of people, then the sample can be said to be not sufficiently randomised.
ReplyDeleteDid i say "survey the whole population to find an average"? I meant to say 'representative average', not just any average.
ReplyDelete